Talk:Richard Graham (politician)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conflict of interest editing and edit war??

I note the repeated removal of properly cited material by one or more WP:SPAs, on occasions quoting "excessive detail" or "irrelevant material". The page has a number of experienced editors and the amount of detail does not appear to fall foul of WP:UNDUE. Please check Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure ..but if you are close to the subject and feel you have a genuine complaint e.g. inaccurate reporting, don't hesitate say so on the talk page -we want to get it right too! I intend to revert to my version of 22 August. I do note there are one or two broken links and I will attempt to replace or restore them. If there is continued removal of material I will ask an administrator to look at the page. Regards JRPG (talk) 22:06, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at any related pages for backbench British politicians there is no where near as much detail as this one. We have noted that many of those who originally added the details had a conflict of interest and so simply wished to remove the excessive detail. In the interest of neutrality we have left several details which could be perceived as negative but removed unnecessary additions. Megggg6543 (talk) 10:11, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments have been noted. However I still believe you have a conflict of interest. You are free to report others with a conflict of interest but other stuff exists applies. JRPG (talk) 16:21, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Biased editing yet again! I'm here to create an encyclopaedia not write an election flyer -see wp:NOTHERE!

82.32.72.87, Megggg6543 has agreed to work with me to see if we can produce a better more neutral article and everything she has done recently appears compliant. I routinely work with experienced editors of different beliefs without any problem and I write about politicians of both major parties, particularly looking at removing bias. Please do not undo my recent edits without a good reason. If you still believe I am biased please say why -on this talk page -and I will ask a third party to look at it.

You both have useful expertise on this constituency. You might like to look at Wikipedia:Good article criteria as a standard we should try and meet. Regards JRPG (talk) 19:32, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eton

@Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi: Hi Fortuna, I'm sure you are aware that this page has been a I/P battle ground. I have previously re-added Eton which was sourced by an existing Telegraph article. I note most of the 'early life' section is missing or has disappeared & I hadn't expected his school to be contentious. The bottom of my talk page has a message from Megggg6543 offering to work with other contributors. Regards JRPG (talk) 21:45, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Only Cantonese & Mandarin speaker.

@2a02:c7d:c83d:ce00:545b:ad2d:5080:b457: Greetings 2a02:c7d:c83d:ce00:545b:ad2d:5080:b457. Your edit of 21:51, 17 May 2017 relating to "Graham being the only Parliamentarian who speaks Cantonese and Mandarin" inserted text describing his claim as "patently false." That appears unnecessarily offensive to the subject, hence I removed it. Whilst the claim is minor, as you say, Ashdown passed an interpreter's course and it therefore appears to wrong so I'll remove it. Regards JRPG (talk) 20:38, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

At some point there will be a Wiki page on MPs owned by the CCP

And this traitor will be at the top of the list, I though it worth noting now. 82.9.95.224 (talk) 08:09, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]